Unkosher Jesus- Red Meat Commentary With a Side of Cheese: Religious Intolerance

Lloyd Bentsen's "You're no JFK" Zinger

The late, great Senator Lloyd Bentsen (D-TX), ladies and gentlemen! What a great zinger he used to nail Dan Quayle and keep him from getting away with shamelessly trying to compare himself to the late President John F. Kennedy.

That same zinger would have worked in reference to another Republican White House hopeful this week. I'm referring to the one and only Mitt Romney who, when confronted by the surging poll numbers of another conservative white male evangelical Christian, decided that it was time to publicly embrace his Mormon faith and let all America know what he's made of.

The speech was made from the George H. W. Bush Presidential Library in Houston. Now, given that George the Elder was a one-term wonder and much-reviled by the rabid conservative base of the Republican Party, you have to wonder why Mitt chose to give his speech from Poppy's place, and not from the Temple of the Great and Powerful Ron in California. Actually, it's not so hard to figure out, given that Romney and his staff have been telegraphing how his speech would mirror John F. Kennedy's epochal speech on his Catholic faith and his vision for America, given on Sept. 12, 1960, before the Greater Houston Ministerial Association.

So, is Mitt a Latter Day JFK, or the Second Coming of Dan Quayle? Here's how some of his comments and observations stack up against those of JFK.

Freedom of Religion AND Freedom From Religion

JFK: "I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end--where all men and all churches are treated as equal--where every man has the same right to attend or not attend the church of his choice (emphasis added)."

Mitt: "Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom. Freedom opens the windows of the soul so that man can discover his most profound beliefs and commune with God. Freedom and religion endure together, or perish alone."

Unkosher Jesus sez: Kennedy had the balls to acknowledge that the bedrock strength of American liberty lies not in its supposed Judeo-Christian moorings, but rather in the fact that it is a value that can be equally espoused and exercised by the religious and non-religious alike. American Freedom does NOT rely or depend upon religion: it depends upon each citizen's commitment to the principles espoused in the Constitution. This in turn does not require religious faith on the part of any citizen who supports these. Mitt's nonsense line that "freedom requires religion" is nothing but a shamless, open-mouthed kiss for fundamentalist, Evangelical Christianity.

A TRULY United States

JFK: "I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish; where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source; where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials; and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all."

Mitt: "Almost 50 years ago another candidate from Massachusetts explained that he was an American running for president, not a Catholic running for president. Like him, I am an American running for president. I do not define my candidacy by my religion. A person should not be elected because of his faith nor should he be rejected because of his faith."

Unkosher Jesus sez: Mitt is dishonestly distorting the issue at hand here. No, you do not define your campaign for president by your religion (Mormonism, right?), but by religion itself. Romney's self-comparison to JFK is disingenuous, in this case because Kennedy avoided the use of religious themes altogether in his campaign for the White House. He enunciated a vision of a truly United States, whereas Romney's vision of America is clearly and explicitly one where religious citizens are valued more than those who espouse no religious creed or belong to any established faith. I guess some animals are more equal than others, huh Mitt?

Faith As Personal, Private Conviction

JFK: "But I do not intend to apologize for these views to my critics of either Catholic or Protestant faith, nor do I intend to disavow either my views or my church in order to win this election."

Mitt: "There are some for whom these commitments are not enough. They would prefer it if I would simply distance myself from my religion, say that it is more a tradition than my personal conviction, or disavow one or another of its precepts. That I will not do. I believe in my Mormon faith and I endeavor to live by it. My faith is the faith of my fathers - I will be true to them and to my beliefs."

Unkosher Jesus sez: Funny, for a candidate who has staked so much of his campaign and presidential persona upon the importance of religious faith, Romney didn't spend any of his time during his twenty minute speech actually discussing or describing any of these beliefs at all. Again, his aping of JFK is disingenuous, as Kennedy scrupulously avoided the use of religious imagery and themes as means to winning votes.

Fighting for American Freedom

JFK: "This is the kind of America I believe in, and this is the kind I fought for in the South Pacific, and the kind my brother died for in Europe."

Mitt: [Cue crickets.]

Unkosher Jesus sez: This would be the place where I would write about how Mitt reflected upon his military service and how he views this experience as the time when the ideals of American freedom were,... well, you get the idea. Mitt didn't serve in the United States military. He was draft age during the Vietnam War, but, like most of his Republican brethren, somehow avoided fighting in that conflict (or serving in the military at all). He seemed to have had other priorities, just like his Chicken Hawk Vice President, Dick Cheney. And, just for the record, none of his five supposedly able-bodied sons is serving in Iraq.

Know Your Founding Fathers

JFK: "And in fact, this is the kind of America for which our forefathers died, when they fled here to escape religious test oaths that denied office to members of less favored churches; when they fought for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom."

Mitt: "There are some who may feel that religion is not a matter to be seriously considered in the context of the weighty threats that face us. If so, they are at odds with the nation's founders, for they, when our nation faced its greatest peril, sought the blessings of the Creator. And further, they discovered the essential connection between the survival of a free land and the protection of religious freedom."

Unkosher Jesus sez: Mitt has been taking "Straw Man" lessons from W. Who, exactly, has said that "religion is not a matter to be seriously considered in the context of weighty threats"? Who the hell is he talking about? This is a particularly defensive and divisive comment to make for someone who is trying to show that his religious faith does not pose any type of threat to American values. Worse yet, Romney misrepresents the Founding Fathers' notion of religious freedom, intentionally omitting the part about equal freedom not to practice religion. Maybe I'll give JFK the last word on that one:

"I believe in a president whose religious views are his own private affair, neither imposed by him upon the nation, or imposed by the nation upon him as a condition to holding that office."

So, is Mitt a Latter Day JFK? Not even close. Is he the Second Coming of Dan Quayle? He's worse! Quayle was truly ignorant and shallow, while Mitt is running a campaign premised on the hope that most voters are.

- Doug L.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy: A Tribute

FOR FURTHER REFERENCE:

Text of Romney's "faith in America" speech (Salt Lake Tribune, December 6, 2007)

The Mormons (PBS Frontline)

Bloggers on Mitt Romney's big speech (Slate.com, December 6, 2007)

Mitt's Big Speech (WashingtonMonthly.com, December 6, 2007)

Holy Nonsense, by Christopher Hitchens (Slate.com, December 6, 2007)

JPTV: What I'm Watching Tomorrow (Time.com, December 5, 2007)

Romney Loves All Gods, Hates All Seculars (Wonkette.com, December 6, 2007)

On Faith Panel: Mitt Romney's Religion Speech (Washington Post.com, December 6, 2007)

The Life of Romney, by Bruce Reed (The Has Been, Slate.com, July 5, 2007)

JFK In History: John F. Kennedy and PT109 (JFKLibrary.org)

Little-Known U.S. Document Signed by President Adams Proclaims America's Government Is Secular (Early America.com, Summer 1997)

This just in: today's Washington Post reports that opponents of presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) are spreading "rumors" that he is a Muslim. "Muslim" is obviously being used to associate Senator Obama with radical Islamic terrorists, and to otherwise smear him as un-American. How vile. And, given the current state of political discourse in the United States, how sadly predictable.

And, not to quibble, but although the definition of the word "rumor" is technically applicable to the particular innuendo and insinuations being made about Senator Obama, I think that the Post erred in its usage. You spread rumors about the teacher who is thought to be a child molester. You spread rumors about the mayor's alleged affair with a member of the city council. You spread rumors about the doting old biddy church volunteer who is suspected of pilfering donations from the collection plate. You don't spread rumors about what faith someone supposedly belongs to. So, please, writers and editors of the Post, stick to (return to?) accurate reporting and analysis. FOX, The Weekly Standard, The American Spectator, and other conservative "news" outlets have the rumor mill and character assassination beat covered.

(Tom Toles editorial cartoon: Washington Post, November 30, 2007)

So, now that we've got that settled, think this is the last time we'll see an American politician's alleged connections to the Muslim faith used against him or her? Sadly, no. There are loads of conservative Republicans who are all too happy to keep fanning the flames of ignorance, hate and divisiveness, such as:

Glenn Beck, CNN

Rush Limbaugh

Michelle Malkin

Ann Coulter

Rudy Giuliani

Pat Robertson

Tarring all members of a given faith or ethnic group with the same hateful brush is part and parcel of all of history's fascist movements and governments. Sowing the seeds of hatred and mistrust, fanning the flames of suspicion and fear: what good, constructive purpose can this possibly serve? And how can people who willingly engage in this type of behavior look at themselves in the mirror or sleep at night?

Where Is the Love? (Black Eyed Peas)