Unkosher Jesus- Red Meat Commentary With a Side of Cheese: Proposition 8

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Mormon Baptism of the Dead Is Fatally Flawed Salvation Strategy

As if the bad PR related to its direct support of California's Proposition 8 isn't enough trouble, the Mormon Church has also found itself defending its actions with regard to deceased Holocaust victims. It seems that church members have been posthumously baptizing non-Mormons by proxy, including victims of the Nazi Holocaust. This in spite of the fact that the Church of Latter Day Saints (LDS) signed an agreement with a consortium of Jewish groups in May 1995 agreeing to cease this practice with regard to Holocaust victims unless the surviving family members provided consent.

In publicly denouncing this betrayal of what was thought to be a good-faith agreement, Ernest Michel, honorary chair of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors stated, "We ask you (Church of LDS) to respect us and our Judaism just as we respect your religion, We ask you to leave our six million Jews, all victims of the Holocaust, alone, they suffered enough." In response, Church of LDS elder Lance B. Wickman casually brushed aside Jewish concerns, ignored his own Church's violation of an agreement that it had signed, and stated, "We don't think any faith group has the right to ask another to change its doctrines. If our work for the dead is properly understood ... it should not be a source of friction to anyone. It's merely a freewill offering."

Well, chutzpah may be a Jewish (specifically Yiddish) term for audacity, but it more than certainly applies to Mr. Wickman and his fellow Church of LDS adherents. First of all, no one from Mr. Michel's organization is asking the Church of LDS to "changes its doctrines." As Mr. Wickman's grasp of English appears to be as shaky as his ability to honor signed agreements, let me kindly point out to him that a "doctrine" is something that is taught, whereas a "practice" is an act that is carried out customarily. It is the PRACTICE of Baptism of the Dead that is offending Jews and others.

As for Wickman's comment that Jews who are offended by this practice are at fault for not receiving it in the generous spirit in which it is offered, well, that is just bullshit. The intention clearly doesn't matter here. Various Jewish groups made it clear to the Church of LDS thirteen years ago that they do not wish for the Church to continue the practice of baptizing deceased Jews, and the Church of LDS signed an agreement stating that the practice would indeed cease. Who cares what the intention is when LDS is in clear violation of this agreement?

The Church of LDS has been furtively baptizing deceased Jews, among other deceased non-Mormons, for years. This practice is grounded in a selective reading of Paul (1 Corinthians, Ch. 15, v. 29), a passage that the Mormon Church is apparently exploiting to swell its numbers. Why? Because the constellation of Christian churches do not view Mormonism as a legitimate expression of Christianity. It's possible that the increased numbers gained through proxy baptisms for the dead are a way of demonstrating that there is wider acceptance of Mormon theology than actually exists.

In reading about this topic, I found one Jewish writer whose family has been directly affected by this very issue. Manya Brachear writes a religion blog for the Chicago Tribune called "The Seeker", and in her November 11 entry she describes how her Jewish great-uncle had converted to Mormonism and had arranged for her great-grandfather, a devout and observant Jew, to be posthumously baptized in the Mormon faith. She reflects upon how religion had served as an agent of separation and division in her family's past, and decides to accept this gesture in the spirit in which it was intended.

"We have the freedom to choose whether religion will unite us or divide us. In the past, my family chose to let it divide. Faced with this revelation, I now realize how torn they must have been. Still, I choose to learn from that mistake and appreciate my cousins' gesture."

I'm of two minds on this one. One the one hand, I applaud her reaction from an interfaith perspective. As a member of an interfaith marriage, I have great appreciation for any attempts made to maintain family ties and allowing room for different expression of religious faith. Further, I appreciate the particular difficulties inherent in such a choice for a member of the Jewish faith.

On the other hand, she is speaking in the context of her own family, where certain members actually belong to the Mormon Church and who did not hide their actions. This is not the case with regard to thousands of other Holocaust victims whom Church of LDS baptized in secret without the permission of their surviving family members.

From almost any perspective, and certainly from the perspective of constructive interfaith dialogue and relations, the Mormon practice of Baptism of the Dead is insensitive, invasive, and quite plainly, odd. The recent response on the part of Church leaders to the protests of Jewish leaders has been arrogant and condescending. This practice blithely disregards the painful history of the forced conversion of Jews by Christians throughout the centuries. It also perverts the doctrine of free will, which presumes that each person is free to make his or her own choices on the condition that they must also live with the consequences. It is preposterous to even suggest that someone who is deceased can still concern himself or herself with the question of whether or not to be baptized here on earth. Whatever choices we make in this life having to do with our religious faith is a deeply personal matter that is between each individual, his or her God, and any other people that this decision is shared with. Under this formulation, the Mormon Church is the missing participant for any such deliberation that does not involve someone's embracing the Mormon faith.

My message to the members of the Mormon Church: keep your hands off the dead, and concern yourselves with the living. Oh, wait. On second thought...

- Doug L.

Yad Vashem: The Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance Authority

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Shoah group halts talks with Mormons on posthumous baptisms of Jews, by Ben Harris (The Jewish Journal, November 19, 2008)

Mormons, Jews Contend for Souls of Dead, by David Waters (WashingtonPost.com, On Faith, November 11, 2008)

Holocaust survivors to Mormons: Stop baptisms of dead Jews (CNN.com, November 11, 2008)

Vatican Warns of Mormon 'Baptism of the Dead' (Catholic.org, May 3, 2008)

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Catholics and Mormons Tag-Team CA Gays

Hooray! Catholics and Mormons have made common cause in the Great State of California to (pop quiz)...

Help the homeless find safe, decent, affordable housing?
Open up a statewide network of food pantries and health clinics for the poor?
Lobby the state government for greater state assistance to California's burgeoning immigrant population?
Engage in a Constitution-based version of Smear the Queer?

For all of you who answered Number 4, DING, DING, DING, you win!

So, the Catholic Church is perfectly comfortable making common cause with the Mormon Church against the right of gay people to enter into a civil marriage, the same Mormon Church whose teachings are otherwise rejected lock, stock and barrel by the self-same Catholic Church. Given the important Constitutional ramifications of this particular Proposition and related court challenges, and given the faith-based nature of this blog, I think it's important to point out the blatant hypocrisy and cynical opportunism represented by these two religions teaming up for the express purpose of codifying discrimination against an embattled minority. I mean, excuse me, but it's not as if Catholics or Mormons have never experienced state-sponsored discrimination at any time in American history. Given the respective histories of these two faiths, you would think that their leaders (and their followers) might be more empathetic and open-minded to the issue of the legal rights of homosexuals. Oh, well. Never mind. So much for, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." I don't know how any Catholic can blithely ignore this command which cuts to the heart of the Gospel message of Jesus. Does this edict not count for Mormons since Jesus wasn't in North America when he said it? (Publisher's Note: That last comment is nothing but pure sarcasm.)

While the Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco (o, irony of ironies!) worked directly with the Mormon Church to campaign in favor of Proposition 8, other faith-based buttinski's also sounded off in favor of state-sponsored discrimination, including:

The Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America;
The American Family Association; and (of course)
Focus on the Family

Do we need any MORE reminders of why the 1st Amendment wall that separates the workings of the United States government from the whims of any one religion is so important? It is one thing for various religions to prohibit same-sex marriage and to otherwise condemn homosexuality per the precepts of their respective beliefs and teachings. Fine, that is their right to enforce their beliefs within the confines of their respective faiths and places of worship. What isn't fine, what isn't right, is for a religion, any religion, to impose on civil society the beliefs and practices that it imposes on its own members. The right of gay couples to enter into a civil marriage is of NO concern to the Catholic Church, the Mormon Church, or any other such religious institution. If you are looking for a way to help push back against this effort to discriminate against and marginalize homosexuals, please take your pick from the following advocacy organizations:

As a nice post-script to this whole mess, James Dobson's Focus on the Family has had to lay off over 200 employees as a result of dumping almost three-quarters-of-a-million dollars in organization funds into the pro-Prop. 8 campaign. Talk about instant karma! Let's hope- no, let's pray- that the good karma keeps on rolling, as the California Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments challenging the validity of Proposition 8. Shalom.

- Doug L.

"Prop 8 - The Musical" (Funny or Die)

See more Jack Black videos at Funny or Die