Hey Candy Man, it's great to hear from you again. Thanks for your terrific post from earlier today, Doug, Jesus and Me. It sets a really positive interfaith tone, and I think helps set the stage for our interfaith dialogue/diablog, one in which our readers are invited to join in on. It is New Year's Eve, and as we prepare to turn the corner to 2009 I don't have a lot of time tonight to write a full response to your post and share all of the things I've been thinking of regarding our diablog, re: the path to common ground over Jesus for Jews and Christians. However, I did want to address one aspect of all of this, that being my own interest in the subject. I am not a particularly religious person these days, but while I may not be a doctrinaire or regularly practicing Catholic, Jesus as a teacher and religious leader is very important to me. He is, in the words of Thich Naht Hahn, an "ultimate door" to knowledge of God and of the self. My desire find a way for Jews and Christians to be able to talk to one another about Jesus is not inspired by any need on my part to proselytize or convert. Quite the contrary! It simply has to do with my true belief that Jesus was a remarkable person, a dynamic teacher, and that there is much about him that could and should be re-examined, not only by Jews but by his very followers as well. I think that this endeavor has the real potential to completely transform the dynamic that has served to separate, oftentimes violently, Christians and Jews for over a thousand years.
As I said, I plan to post a lengthier response to Candy Man and his comments. I'm very excited about where our diablog will take us. We both have a great deal to learn from each other, and anyhow, it is always great to find a kindred spirit as you journey along life's highway. For now, I'll close by quoting the Preface of a fantastic and highly topical historical novel, When Jesus Became God. Written by George Mason University professor Richard Rubenstein, this book dramatizes the First Council of Nicea (325 CE), at which the Church first formally enunciated the official Church teaching on the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth and his co-equal status with God (Nicene Creed). Just consider that for a moment before you being reading: The Church had not officially declared Jesus to be one with God until 300 years after his crucifixion! I agree with Prof. Rubenstein: this is highly significant, vis-à-vis Jewish-Christian relations. I do not think it is even something that most Jews or Christians are even aware of. At any rate, the following passage reflects in no small part my own thoughts and feelings on the subject of Jesus as an interfaith bridge builder. So, enough of my yakkin'...
I told Fr. Joe that my interest (in studying about the Arian controversy) was in exploring the sources of religious conflict and the methods people have used to resolve it. I wanted to examine a dispute familiar enough to westerners to involve them deeply, but distant enough to permit some detached reflection. The Arian controversy, which was probably the most serious struggle between Christians before the Protestant Reformation, seemed to fit the bill perfectly...
Joe nodded, but he knew my account was incomplete. "And?"
"And there's something else," I responded with some hesitation. "I am a Jew born and raised in a Christian country. Jesus has been a part of my mental world since I was old enough to think. On the one hand, I have always found him an enormously attractive figure, challenging and inspiring. On the other... When I was little, growing up in a mixed Jewish-Catholic neighborhood, most of my playmates were Italian-American boys. They were friends, but I learned to stay in my own house on Good Friday, since after hearing the sermon at St. Joseph's Church, some of them would come looking for me to punish me for killing Christ. Once they caught me out on the street and knocked me down. 'But Jesus was a Jew!' I shouted through my tears. That idea, which they had never contemplated, infuriated them. It earned me a few extra kicks and punches."
Joe looked sorrowful, and I hastened to explain. "That's one side of the story. Sometimes it seems that Jesus has meant nothing but trouble for us. But the other side is that he can't be ignored. I don't worship Jesus, who - I'm sorry, Joe - I believe to have been a man, not God's Son. But what a man! I think that if his followers hadn't caused us so much trouble, we would consider him at least a tzaddik, a great sage. Perhaps even a prophet."
"I want to write about this controversy because it tells us so much about where we come from and what divides us. The story may even suggest how violent divisions can be healed. And, somehow, I believe that the figure of Jesus will play an important role in that healing. I think his life teaches us what it really means to be members of the human family."
Happy New Year! Shalom.
- Doug L.
FOR FURTHER REFERENCE:
When Jesus Became God: The Struggle to Define Christianity during the Last Days of Rome, by Dr. Richard E. Rubenstein (Amazon.com)
Jesus in Jewish-Christian-Muslim Dialogue (The Institute of Interfaith Dialog)
In Praise of Christian-Jewish Interfaith Dialogue (JewsOnFirst.org)
Healing the Jewish-Christian Rift: Growing Beyond Our Wounded History, by Ron Miller and Laura Bernstein (Jewish Lights Publishing)
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
The Candy Man Can
Posted by
Unkosher Jesus
at
12/31/2008 11:22:00 PM
2
comments
Labels: Candy Man, Jesus of Nazareth, Lubab No More, Richard Rubenstein
Friday, December 19, 2008
Rabbi Jesus
I was sitting in a discussion circle at the DC Jewish Community Center over a year ago. The event was a reunion of sorts. Couples who had participated in the JCC's interfaith couples course were invited to come back and share their experiences, to check in and discuss how things were working. The discussion was going pretty well, but I detected a pause when I made a comment about how I hoped that continued interfaith dialogue between Christians and Jews could make it possible to openly discuss Jesus as a person and a teacher without consternation or discomfort on anyone's part, Christian or Jew.
I should mention that the JCC does not support interfaith arrangements like the one I have with my wife, and prefer that if someone who is Jewish marries a non-Jewish partner, that the household still be solely Jewish with regard to religious observance. In that sense, perhaps it was wildly optimistic of me to make that comment it that particular setting and expect that the others would be enthusiastic about discussing it further.Be that as it may, it was still a disappointing moment for me. As I've written previously, it is a source of sadness and frustration for me that Jesus serves as a confounding rather than a unifying figure for Jews and Christians. And so I was excited to read a post published by fellow blogger Lubab No More, and guest-written by Candy Man, called A Rabbi Named Jesus. It's a great post with some important insights as to the identity and message of Jesus from an Orthodox Jewish perspective. For example, Candy Man cites Jesus' inclination to sit at table with anyone with whose company he chose to share. This inevitably meant breaking bread with tax collectors, prostitutes, and the like, as a means to bringing his ministry directly to those most in need of it, a habit that ensured that Jesus would inevitably, regularly violate Torah codes regulating ritual purity. Candy Man's reference to Jesus' eating habits reminded me of the illustration seen above. It's simply entitled The Lord's Supper, and was sketched for The Catholic Worker newspaper by Fritz Eichenberger during the mid-20th Century. A priest I knew in college used to affectionately refer to this illustration as The Last Supper With Bums. I say affectionately because he was not making a joke about the illustration or being derisive towards the homeless. He was making the same basic point as Candy Man: Jesus was a man who saw as more important the need to be present to others and treat them humanely and compassionately than the need to keep ritually clean by avoiding sinners.
Who was Jesus? I think that there is enough historic evidence to show that he was a rabbi, for starters. I've also heard him described as a religious genius. Episcopalian Bishop John Shelby Spong describes Jesus as "a person of history in whom and through whom Jewish people believed that they had experienced the presence of the holy God." Candy Man commented that Jesus saw himself as a teacher within mainstream Judaism who did not seek to establish a new religion, and sought to fulfill the Torah commandments. I would simply add that while I agree with this, I also agree with Bishop Spong's assessment of Jesus' ministry as one of spiritual liberation for all people, Jew and Gentile alike. As Spong writes in his most recent book, Jesus For the Non-Religious, "When I look at this Jesus, I no longer see God in human form. I rather look at Jesus and see a humanity open to all that God is- open to life, open to love and open to being. So the first barrier, which limits humanity with tribal identity, is broken open and in the process Jesus breaks out of the prison of tribal religion. It is the profoundly human Jesus that enables us to step beyond the tribal limits that so deeply impede our humanity."
This is all to say that I am grateful to Candy Man for posting his thoughts about Jesus. I look forward to promoting a dialogue (diablog?) that helps transform Jesus from a dividing figure between Christians and Jews to one who can unite us. So, Candy Man, let's spread peace via the Internet, as you say, and get this dialogue started.
I'll end tonight's post with the following reflection on Jesus that was written by Abram Leon Sachar, a Jewish-American scholar, the first president of Brandeis University, and the author of A History of the Jews, in which the following passage was published:
"It was a tragedy for Jesus that historic circumstances conspired to make some of the leaders of his people intolerant of his ethical teachings. A revival of the militant prophetic liberalism was sorely needed to revitalize the Judaism of his day. Perhaps if Messianic claims had not been intertwined with his teachings, his own and later generations would have taken him to heart and given him a deserved place among the noblest of the Jewish prophets.
"But a greater tragedy was his acceptance by the Greek Fathers who took his name and made it the sanction for a new theology. The Roman world was indeed made better for the conquering faith which it adopted, but Jesus was not honored by the adulteration of his teachings. Through the thick cloud of religious incense, offered by the piety of countless generations, it is difficult to recognize the magnetic teacher of Galilee, who preached a gospel of love in an era filled with hate, whose simple humanity was a solace to those who lived in darkness."
Jesus Christ Superstar
- Doug L.
FOR FURTHER REFERENCE:
Reclaiming Jesus- The Jewish Standard, 12.09.2005
From Jesus to Christ: He was born, lived, and died as a Jew (Frontline, PBS.org)
Bishop John Shelby Spong Preacher and Teacher Bio Page (BeliefNet.com)
Jewish Voices About Jesus (Jewish-Christian Relations.net)
The Catholic Worker
Jesus Was a Jewish Liberal magnet (AllPosters.com)
What Wouldn't Jesus Do? t-shirt (BustedTees.com)
Posted by
Unkosher Jesus
at
12/19/2008 11:13:00 PM
4
comments
Labels: Candy Man, Dr. Abram Leon Sachar, Fritz Eichenberger, Jesus Christ, John Shelby Spong, Lubab No More, The Catholic Worker